2 min read

The Ongoing Crypto ETF Race: Is it Unfair?

The cryptocurrency world, as well as the traditional financial world, is abuzz with talk of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). It appears to be the next frontier in the increasing convergence of traditional finance and digital assets. Recent developments, however, indicate a potential issue looming on the horizon, raising questions about fair competition and regulatory actions.

The Key Players

Recently, investment management companies BlackRock and Fidelity have filed for cryptocurrency ETFs. While this news is a testament to the growing mainstream acceptance of cryptocurrencies, it has raised eyebrows due to the regulatory history of another company - Grayscale.

For years now, Grayscale Investments has been attempting to get approval for a Bitcoin ETF, but their requests have been consistently denied by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Their continual denial led Grayscale to file a lawsuit against the regulators.

The problem is not that other companies are moving into the crypto ETF space; the issue lies in the potential consequences if BlackRock or Fidelity get approval before Grayscale.

The Big Questions

Given BlackRock's impressive SEC ETF approval rate of 575-1, many speculate that the chances of them securing approval for a crypto ETF are high. The question becomes: is it fair for the SEC to approve BlackRock's ETF and not Grayscale's, given that Grayscale has been making attempts to secure approval for years?

It would create a stark contrast in the treatment of companies and potentially undermine faith in the regulatory process. The implications of such an action would be significant.

The Implications

If BlackRock and Fidelity receive approval before Grayscale, the latter stands to lose a lot, as they would not be the first to market. This situation would cause Grayscale to miss out on potential customers and substantial profit, much of which would likely be scooped up by BlackRock or Fidelity.

It's worth noting that being the first to market in financial services can often lead to a dominant market position. In such a fast-growing and lucrative sector as crypto ETFs, this could translate into hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars.

Furthermore, if approval for a crypto ETF were given to BlackRock or Fidelity, companies traditionally associated with the old guard of finance, over Grayscale, a company intrinsically linked to the crypto sector, it could fuel resentment and accusations of favoritism within the crypto community.

The Bottom Line

Overall, these developments pose significant questions about the fairness of regulatory processes and the potential consequences for companies like Grayscale. They highlight the ongoing tensions between traditional finance and the burgeoning world of cryptocurrencies, and emphasize the importance of transparent, fair regulatory practices for the sake of market health and trust.

While it is clear that crypto ETFs are on the horizon, what remains uncertain is who will get there first and at what cost. The decisions made by regulators in the coming months will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the landscape of cryptocurrency investment.

Investing in Crypto: The Bottom and the Looming Bull Run

Cryptocurrency has never been a space for the faint of heart, with its extreme volatility and the associated risks and rewards. But, it's essential...

Read More

The Ongoing Crypto ETF Race: Is it Unfair?

The cryptocurrency world, as well as the traditional financial world, is abuzz with talk of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). It appears to be the next...

Read More

BlackRock Initiates Bitcoin ETF Filing in a Bold Move Towards Cryptocurrency

In July 2022, BlackRock, the world's largest asset management firm, was actively traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). 

Read More